In this particular blog
chapter six discusses Ethics in Corrections. What should be the basis for an
ethical system of guarding prisoners? The first factor is the need to protect
the staff and consider security the dominant purpose of a prison. When dealing
with ethics in corrections there are three models of incarceration that has
predominated since the early years: custodial, rehabilitation, and
reintegration. Each reflects one style of institutional organization. For
example, the custodial model assumes that prisoners have been incarcerated for
the purpose of incapacitation, deterrence, or retribution. The rehabilitation
model emphasizes treatment programs designed to reform the offender. Lastly,
the reintegration model is linked to the structure and goals of community
corrections. This particular model emphasizes maintaining offenders’ ties to
family and community. It is noteworthy that I mention that we can find
correctional facilities that build off each of these models. However, with my
evolvement and communication with those affiliated with the prison system it
appears that most prisons are mainly custodial. Most likely because it emphasizes security, discipline, and order, which subordinate the prisoner to guards and higher authority.
Corrections is a people-processing operation, its personnel are its resource. A number of studies have attempted to explain the basis and nature of this coercive power and authority. It is the exercise of this power that creates ethical issues and dilemmas. The most obvious fact about the prison environment is that guards are vested with power and authority over the prisoners which they exercise power to control inmates in accordance with prison rules and regulations. Our text discusses five forms of guard power: legitimate, coercive, reward, expert, and referent. With legitimate power, guards are invested with authority to command as a result of their position as a guard of prisoners. It is the position of guard itself within the institutional structure that confers the right to give instructions and to be obeyed. In short, a guard's command are obeyed because they are the commands of a guard, and prisoners comply by virtue of their status as prisoners. Prisons are expected to be impersonal, quasi-military organizations where strict discipline, minimal amenities, and restrictions on freedom carry out the punishment.
Subsequently, because prisons are expected to pursue many different and often incompatible goals, it would seem that they are almost doomed to fail.
Frederick: You wrote a very good blog on ethics in the correctional system. Since you referred to the textbook, a citation to the textbook was required. Professor Taylor
ReplyDeleteOkay...
DeleteI agree with your post. Most correctional institution is conformed by the principle you have mentioned. Some of the correctional institutions fail to rehabilitate the offenders before releasing them. I think if the correctional system and guards was not so focused on the custodial side of the three you mentioned, then there would be less repeat offenders. Most of the guys I talked to around the way tell me that while they were inside they felt like no one cared so why should them. The minute a person walks in jail they get classified according to the crime, they should also be set up with a plan to change and have a mentor checking on them.
ReplyDeleteRay, in my opinion rehabilitation would reduce the rate of recidivism. (Thanks for the feedback) Fred...
DeleteFred,
ReplyDeleteI am 100% in support of the custodial model you described. I had to better myself through my own means, be it finding work which provided on the job training, through loans or grants for higher education, or through self training through another means. I do not believe the main focus of corrections is to train the offender but to punish them. While I can see that there will be challenges for the offender to reintegrate into society, I see that as a consequence of their actions. and not societies responsibility to fix.
James, I can see how support for punishing an offender for their actions can be looked at as a structured tool to use. Today, a person convicted of a crime should expect to be punished. However, I do support any tool that can be used to help reduce recidivism, and rehabilitation in my opinion helps those in transitioning the best. (Thanks for the feedback) Fred...
DeleteFrederick,
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, I am one inclined to believe that everyone in prison is not guilty of the crimes they have been punished for. With that being said I am an advocate of training programs to rehabilitate prisoner. Since most prisoner know the prison system very well, I feel that they would make great correction officers. They should be programs in place to train prisoner as correction officer and a condition of a early release program for good behavior should be to serve five years as a corrections officer. Like former addicts make the best drug counselors, a former prisoner would make a good correction officer