In this specific blog I chose to discuss terrorism.
Terrorism in my opinion is premeditated violence. However, there is no single
uniformly accepted definition of terrorism that is applicable to all places and
all circumstances. After the events of 9/11 it was clear that disaster can
happen anytime and anywhere. September 11 attacks was all the federal
government needed for a motive to create a comprehensive plan to synchronize
the nation’s preparedness. Although, I believe the incident in New York was
handled with a great deal of courage, other may feel different. Some argue how
they believe New York first responders handled the incident poorly and it
hindered our safety and wellbeing. Compared to the attack to the pentagon I can
see why some argue that New York first responder’s response to a crisis was
problematic. This in turn, would cause President Bush to mandate a plan to
develop a National Response Framework. I believe the United States ultimate
goal is to achieve preparedness so the horrific activities on 9/11 will not be
repeated. After the 9/11 attack we now have what we call the National Incident
Management System (NIMS). This system allows all acting agencies on scene to be
on the same page. Without unified command (UC) theirs no structure or a
strategy for one incident action plan. Simply stated, in my opinion the
partnership between first responders proved a great deal of readiness is
important in the heat of battle.
Frederick: You have written a good blog on defining terrorism. Professor Taylor
ReplyDeleteI agree with your post. War against terrorism is each nation matter. Anything that happens in the main countries that was brought by terrorism will affect the low level countries. I think is not only a matter of national security but worldwide security too. So many steps that are been taking against terrorism should be better enforced in all countries .
ReplyDeletethanks